Buzz

Sources of Capital - Angel Investors

Kenneth H. Marks, Larry E. Robbins, Gonzalo Fernandez, John P. Funkhouser and D. L. Sonny Williams


ANGEL INVESTORS

Angel investors*1 are individuals who use their personal cash to invest in early stage companies. This section describes the fundamentals of angel investing, compares angels with venture capitalists, and offers suggestions for best practices for entrepreneurs.

Sound off on this buzz in the Comments Section.


Angel investors are so named because in the early 1900s wealthy individuals provided capital to help launch new theatrical productions. As patrons of the arts, these investors were considered by theater professionals to be "angels." Estimates of the number of active angel investors in the United States vary widely, most being accredited. The SEC Rule 501 states that an accredited investor is a person with a net worth of at least $1 million or annual income for the most recent two years of at least $200,000 and a reasonable expectation of $200,000 in annual income for the current year. According to Forrester Research, Inc., the number of households in the United States that fit that profile is approximately 630,000.

Angels fill a critical capital gap between friends and family and the venture capitalist (VC). When a start-up requires more than $25,000 but less than about $1.5 million, angels are a viable source of capital. This level of funding is below the radar screen of most VCs, although some will occasionally fund a seed round of as little as $500,000.

During the past few decades, VCs have raised larger and larger pools of capital, and given that the time and expense of reviewing and funding a company are the same regardless of size, it is far more efficient for VCs to fund larger transactions. Though the demarcation line is blurring, angels and VCs rarely compete for the same deals; you can see in Table 5.2 the major differences in their profiles.

Angels Are Varied

Angels can sometimes add significant value to start-up companies. It is important to be aware of the value that is important to your company and its needs as you pursue funding. Keep in mind that angels are subject to their personal idiosyncrasies. One or more of these characterizations may apply to an angel:

Guardian Angel. This type of investor has relevant industry expertise and will be actively involved in helping the start-up achieve success. He has a strong Rolodex of contacts and has the experience to add substantial value as a board member.

Operational Angel. This angel has significant experience as a senior executive in major corporations. For an entrepreneur, this type of investor can add much value because he knows what the company needs to do in order to scale up operations. However, be careful because this angel may have no idea of how to operate a small business without the significant management depth found in larger companies. Someone who has been successful in managing by the numbers can be demanding in requests for financial information.

table5.2

Entrepreneurial Angel. An investor who has "been there, done that" may be very valuable to a novice entrepreneur. For example, an entrepreneur can add perspective to the founders on what to expect from investors and how to effectively negotiate financing terms. An entrepreneurial angel with operating experience is ideal!

Hands-off Angel. A wealthy doctor, attorney, or similar professional must focus on his day-to-day career. This type of investor is willing to invest but usually does not have the time or specific expertise to be of much help to the start-up.

Control Freak. Some investors believe they have all the answers because they have achieved certain wealth, or they have the personality to convince themselves they know everything. Caveat emptor.

Lemming. Some angel investors will not make a decision unless an informal leader in the angel group invests or makes positive comments about a start-up. Success breeds success. Even a term sheet from one or two small investors can allow an entrepreneur to access larger investors, who usually become more interested when they find out that fellow investors have committed. Some lemming investors are particularly astute at leveraging the work of other investors, whereas other lemmings simply trust blindly in the due diligence and term sheets of fellow investors. Generally, these investors are not active in the operating decisions of the company.

Angels Band Together

Angel investors increasingly join one or more informal or formal groups. There are various advantages of working in groups:

  • Social bonds and networking.
  • Leveraging intellectual capital and expertise of individual members.
  • Learning from each other regarding deal evaluation skills.
  • More extensive due diligence capability.
  • Alignment of members' interests.
Angel groups can be structured in various ways:
  • Each member owns a portion of the legal entity representing the group.
  • Limited liability entities are formed by individuals to invest in specific deals.
  • The group is a nonprofit entity, and individual angels invest independently.

Typically an entrepreneur must complete a questionnaire and submit an executive summary or a full business plan. A proactive entrepreneur will understand the angel investing process. Some groups require that a member meet with the entrepreneur and determine if the plan is viable before allowing the entrepreneur to present to the group. Other groups allow the administrative staff and managing director to review the plan and invite the entrepreneur to present without a champion. The questionnaire will typically include the following:

  • Name of company.
  • Year founded and legal structure [C corporation, S corporation, limited liability company (LLC), etc.].
  • Who referred you to this angel group?
  • Summary of business (in three sentences or less).
  • What problem is your product or service solving?
  • What is the size of the market, how much has it grown in the past few years, and what is its projected growth?
  • Describe the competition (companies as well as substitute products).
  • What are your company's competitive advantages?
  • Why will your company succeed in the long run?
  • Does the company or its founders have any relevant patents or proprietary technologies? (Please do not reveal specific proprietary information. tt)
  • What is the relevant experience of each member of the management team? Please enclose a one-page resume of the CEO.
  • What is the company's sales and marketing strategy?
  • If you have a web site, what is the URL?
  • What are the major short-, medium-, and long-range operational milestones you intend to achieve?
  • Financial information as shown in Table 5.3.
  • Are 50 percent or more of revenues generated from one or two customers?
  • What are the three greatest risks of this venture?
  • What are the liabilities outstanding other than operational payables and accruals-especially off-balance-sheet items?
  • What is your capitalization structure? (How many shares are currently owned by founders and investors? How much capital has been invested so far, and by whom?)
  • How much capital are you seeking, and how will this capital be used?
  • How many rounds of investment and what amounts do you expect to need in total?

table5.3

  • Please list the names and companies of your professional advisers (attorney, CPA, and/or consultant).
  • Who is the main contact person at the company? Please provide address, telephone, mobile phone, and fax.

Once the presentation is made (usually in 10 to 30 minutes, including a question-and-answer period) the entrepreneur is asked to leave the room. The angels discuss the opportunity, and if one or more angels are interested, then, depending on the group, either the entrepreneur is invited back at a later date for a more thorough review of the plan or an initial term sheet is developed within a week and presented to the entrepreneur. A list of typical terms is provided in Table 5.4.

Sometimes, if an entrepreneur's presentation is weak but the idea has merit, the entrepreneur will be coached on what to do in order to be able to present in a future meeting. Occasionally, the entrepreneur is matched with an angel who is willing to coach the entrepreneur (informally or for a fee) in order to raise the quality of the business to fundable status. Some angels specialize in helping entrepreneurs write business plans and develop their strategies.

Angel groups occasionally band together with other angel groups to share due diligence and invest sufficient capital to complete a round of financing.

table5.4

Evaluation of Business Plans

Companies do not build themselves. People build companies. Ultimately, an angel investor is selecting a management team. A great team can make even a mediocre company achieve reasonable success, whereas a company with the best technology will not be successful with a mediocre management team.

Some of the key factors of a business plan that improve the success potential of a start-up are shown in Table 5.5. While presented in this section, these success factors also apply to traditional venture capital.

table5.5

Business plans are inherently subject to change. Projections will change. Teams will change. Competitors will surge or fade. Most successful companies make radical changes to their business plans as managers discover the reality of their situation versus their original expectations. Thus, the experience of a management team is critical in order to address sudden changes in strategy. Business plans require updates anytime major changes occur. The right angel investor can play a critical role in mentoring management teams and helping prepare them for venture funding.

Valuation Is Highly Negotiable in Early Stage Investing

Valuation is much more of an art than a science, especially for companies with no revenues or profits. In theory, a company is valued based on its ability to generate cash in the future. These future cash flows can be discounted using basic financial formulas in order to estimate the total present value today of all future cash flows.

For companies without positive cash flow but with revenues or net income, comparisons can be made with publicly traded companies in similar industries. For example, if ABC start-up is in the medical software business, and publicly traded companies in the same industry trade for approximately two times annual sales, then it is reasonable to estimate the value of ABC as somewhat less than two times its annual sales. Usually a discount of 20 to 40 percent is made for private companies due to the fact that their stock is not publicly traded and the likelihood of matching willing sellers and buyers of private stock is fairly low.

Investors refer to the valuation of a company prior to receiving a round of investment as premoney. Once funding occurs, at that instant, the value of the company rises by the amount of funding and the post-money value is determined. For example, a company valued at $1 million premoney will be worth $1.2 million post-money after receiving a round of $200,000 in funding. The investor in that round owns one-sixth of the company ($200,000 is one-sixth of $1.2 million).

If a start-up has no revenues, then valuation is subject to much negotiation and relies more on common practices of angel and venture capital investors. A hot company with patents or competitive advantages and potential for hundreds of millions of dollars in sales will certainly command a larger value than one with only tens of millions in potential sales, but hard rules are difficult to establish in the investing industry. Angels commonly value seed stage, concept-type firms with premoney valuation ranges from $500,000 to $1 million while early stage venture capitalists start with premoney valuations in the $2 million to $3 million range.

Latest Developments in Angel Financing

Angel investor groups have had a difficult time since the stock market debacle in early 2000. Many early stage companies ran out of cash as early stage financing dried up. Of those start-ups that survived, many had to reach out to venture capitalists who insisted on significantly reducing the ownership percentage of previous investors, including founders and angels.

During times of major decreases in start-up valuations from one financing round to the next, the VCs' basic message to earlier investors was, "If you can't invest in the company in this new round of financing to keep it alive, then you don't deserve to own much of it." This is similar to a poker game: Those players who are unwilling to up the ante lose everything they placed in the pot in previous betting rounds. Tough, but fair.

Some of the larger angel groups have either formed their own funds or joint-ventured with venture capital funds in order to ensure that young companies have the necessary funding in subsequent rounds to support growth. Thus the angels are better able to monitor their investments as the start-ups achieve greater growth.

Tenex Greenhouse, for example, is an angel group in California that has launched a $20 million (target) venture fund using angel and institutional capital to support successful angel-funded start-ups. Tenex Greenhouse also offers intellectual capital, leveraging its members' functional specialties and industry experience to provide support to funded start-ups.

The well-known Band of Angels, started in 1995 in Silicon Valley, now has a $50 million VC fund with capital from institutional investors. From another perspective, Venture Investment Management Company LLC (VIMAC) is a VC fund in Boston that has a network of more than 200 angels who can co-invest on select deals, especially ones that require more advisory work.

One of the results of cross-fertilization of ideas and organizational structures among angels and VCs has been the emergence of typical financing terms (see Table 5.4). Milestone financing is common. Investors mitigate their risk by setting operational targets for the start-up that need to be met before another portion of funding is made. The pricing and terms of the milestone funding are preset to avoid excessive subsequent negotiations.

VC funds have grown larger in size during the past eight to 10 years causing them to seek larger investments and later stage rounds. This has created a vacuum in the market for seed stage capital and increased the opportunities for angels. Unfortunately for entrepreneurs, this has further dispersed the already fragmented market of funding for startup and early stage ventures.

Best Practices for Entrepreneurs

As we have mentioned before in this handbook, only a small percentage (0.2 to 0.5 percent) of all business plans presented to either angels or VCs receive funding. Entrepreneurs need to read the necessary books and speak to individuals with financing experience or expertise so when the opportunity arises, they are fully re pared to present their concept to investors. Incomplete business plans are unacceptable in today's competitive environment.

Ideas are a dime a dozen. Fundable businesses are those that can demonstrate that they have the products and the people to enter an identifiable market and take significant market share.

Use informal networks to be referred to individual angels and VCs. It vastly increases the chances that your business plan will be reviewed.

Invest capital in your own start-up. Not doing so is a major red flag for investors. Do not refer to angel investors as "dumb money," regardless of who you are speaking with and especially in a public forum. Believe it or not, this has actually been done. These kind of amateur mistakes will haunt you, because investors and VCs are a close-knit group.

During the initial conversations with an angel group and during the presentation to the angels, it behooves the entrepreneur to find out which of the members are the real decision makers. This is difficult to ascertain but can be very valuable information because angels are human and they feel safety in numbers. The entrepreneur should focus on the more experienced angels and the managing directors of the angel group.

If groups of investors are interested, it is far better for the company to have them invest as a limited liability company (LLC) than as individuals. VCs are weary of complex capitalization structures, and an entrepreneur risks losing access to larger amounts of capital. In addition, company decision making regarding major events can become unwieldy if large numbers of investor-owners need to be consulted. This process can become like herding cats.

Finding an angel investor is like finding a spouse; personal chemistry is critical because it is a long-term relationship. This chemistry may take time to build, so invest quality time in getting to know the angel. If you are dealing with a group of angels, the lead angel who will be on your board or who will manage the investment on behalf of others should be your focus. It is far better in the long run for an entrepreneur to turn down an angel investment when there is a lack of chemistry and wait for a better match (though this is rarely done if money is made available).

Keep the investor apprised of the company's progress at least monthly if not weekly. If there are problems, alert the investor early about them. Keep investors informed as to possible solutions. If they have the right skills or contacts, involve them in developing the solution or finding the right people to help. If you wait until the last minute before disclosing major issues, you risk losing the confidence of the company's investor group.

Practically Speaking

Entrepreneurs owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to angel investors. Angels are the backbone of our capitalist system; they allow ideas to flourish, and allow managers to become heads of companies and jobs to be created.

Generally, angels are successful entrepreneurs or investors who want to share in the energy of a new idea and the potential growth of its development. Typically, they require less return for the risk assumed, because generally they are believers, willing to invest at inception. This does not mean they are not savvy. All money is hard to raise.

Most of the time angels will be your best investors because they are as committed as the entrepreneur to developing the idea. Institutional interest is in realizing profits and getting there as fast as possible. Angels are more patient, probably because they are in early and are part of developing the idea for commercialization. They are probably more emotionally attached.

Read more about the Sources of Capital in the Encyclopedia of Private Equity and Venture Capital


*1 The base content of this section is adapted from the "Note on Angel Investing," 2003, by Professors Michael Horvath and Fred Wainwright, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Tuck Center for Private Equity and Entrepreneurship. Copyright 0 2003 Trustees of Dartmouth College. All rights reserved.


The above material is excerpted from:

The Handbook of Financing Growth: Strategies and Capital Structure by Kenneth H. Marks, Larry E. Robbins, Gonzalo Fernandez, John P. Funkhouser and D. L. "Sonny" Williams.

To order the Entire Second Edition of, The Handbook of Financing Growth: Strategies, Capital Structure, and M&A Transactions, 2nd Edition

This material is used by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kenneth H. Marks, CM&AA,* is the founder and a managing partner of High Rock Partners, Inc., providing strategic consulting, investment banking, and interim leadership services to emerging growth and middle-market companies. As CEO he founded a high-growth electronics company and, led and sold a technology business to a Forrune 500 buyer. As adviser, he has worked with managers and board members ro develop and implement growth, financing, turnaround, and exit srrategies in over two dozen companies. Marks' past positions include president of JPS Communications, Inc., a fast-growth technology subsidiary of the Raytheon Compnny, and president/CEO of an electronics manufacturer that he founded and grew to $22 million.

Mr. Marks created and teaches an MBA elective titled "Financing Early Stage and Middle-Markct Companies" at North Carolina State University; and created and teaches "Managing Emerging Growth Companies," an MBA elective, at the Hult International Business School in Boston (formerly the Arthur D. Littlc School of Management) in connection with Boston College's Carroll School of Management. He is the author of the publication Strategic Planning for Emerging Growth Companies: A Guide for Management (Wyndham Publishing, 1999).

Mr. Marks was a member of the Young Presidents Organization (YPO); the founding YPO Sponsor of the Young Entrepreneurs Organization (then YE0 and now EO) in the Research Triangle Park. North Carolina Chapter; a member of the Association for Corporate Growth: and a member of the board of directors of the North Carolina Technology Association. Marks obtained his MBA from the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

Larry E. Robbins is a founding partner of Wyrick Robbins Yares & Ponton LLP, a premier law firm locared in the Research Triangle Park arca of North Carolina. He is a frequent lecturer on the topics of venture crlpital and corporate finance and serves on the boards of directors of entrepreneurial support organizations, technology trade associations, and charitable and arts organizations. Mr. Robbins receivcd his BA, MRA, and JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He was also a Morehead Scholar at UNC.

Gonzalo Fern ndez is a retired vice president and controller of ITTs telecom business in Raleigh, North Carolina. Subsequently he spent 15 years working as a finance executive for emerging growth companies and as an accounting and business consultant to other companies. He is a past president of the Raleigh Chapter of the Institute of Management Accountants. He received his BA in accounting from Havana University, Cuba. He wrote the book Estados Financieros (Financial Statements) (Mexico: UTEHA, third edition, 1977).

John P. Funkhouser has been a partner with two venture capital funds, and operated as chief executive officer of four companies in a variety of industries from retail to high technology. In his venture capital capacity, he was a corporate director of more than a dozen companies and headed two venture-backed companies. The most recent company he led from a start-up concept to a public company is a medical diagnostics and devices business. Mr. Funkhouser worked in commercial banking with Chemical Bank of New York, in investment banking with Wheat First Securities, and in venture capital with Hillcrest Group. He has an undergraduate degree from Princeton University and an MBA from the University of Virginia, Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.

D. L. "Sonny" Williams is a managing partner at High Rock Partners. As CEO, for over 25 years he led three global manufacturing/technology companies through major transitions; and as an adviser, he has worked with companies in numerous industries to create value and implement change. Mr. Williams has over 30 years successful operating experience in engineering, manufacturing, sales/marketing, and senior executive roles. His career is highlighted by having led the turnaround of three global manufacturing/technology enterprises ($50 million to $330 million in revenues in nine countries) over a 20-year span in CEO/president/director roles, serving the automotive, consumer, industrial, aircraft, and medical component markets. Mr. Williams' leadership accomplishments include successfully achieving dramatic lean enterprise-based cost restructures, low-cost country expansions/sourcing, and accelerated organic growth through strategic value proposition repositioning; complemented by leading eight acquisition/ merger/joint venture-related negotiation/lintegrations. Mr. Williams' value-creating experiences were magnified by successfully repositioning two of the corporate companies for investment-attractive management buyouts.

Mr. Williams received his BSEE from Kettering University and his Executive MBA from the Kenan Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He is president of the Association for Corporate Growth (Raleigh-Durham chapter) and a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

John Wiley & Sons

Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing cormpany in the United Stares. With offices in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and marketing print and electronic products and services for our customers' professional and personal knowledge and understanding.

The Wiley Finance series contains books written specifically for finance and investment professionals as well as sophisticated individual investors and their financial advisors. Book topics range from portfolio management to e-commerce, risk management, financial engineering, valuation, and financial instrument analysis, as well as much more.

For a list of available titles, visit their Web site at http://www.WileyFinance.com/.


* The Certified Merger & Acquisition Advisor (CM&AA) credential is granted by Loyola University Chicago and the Alliance of Merger & Acquisition Advisors.